The Social Credit System You Already Live In
This blog post was automatically generated (and translated). It is based on the following original, which I selected for publication on this blog:
Your Phone Already Has Social Credit. We Just Lie About It..
The Social Credit System You Already Live In
Social credit, initially defined as distributing industry profits to consumers, has evolved into a system where individual behavior is tracked, scored, and used to determine access to services and opportunities. While often associated with dystopian visions of constant surveillance, the reality is that algorithmic scoring systems are already deeply embedded in our daily lives. The key difference lies in transparency: While China is often criticized for its social credit system, many Western platforms utilize similar mechanisms with far less clarity.
The Myth of the Chinese Social Credit System
The Western perception of China's social credit system often involves comprehensive tracking of citizens' behavior, from jaywalking to purchasing habits. However, reports indicate that a nationwide system doesn't yet exist. Instead, China's system consists of fragmented regulatory compliance tools, primarily focused on financial behavior and business oversight. Individual scoring remains limited to pilot cities, and its impact has been minimal. The primary focus is on court judgment defaults – individuals and companies that refuse to comply with court orders.
Your Phone is Already Scoring You
While the West fixates on the perceived dangers of China's system, numerous apps and platforms on our phones are constantly scoring our behavior. Uber drivers rate passengers, Instagram tracks engagement, banks analyze transactions, LinkedIn measures networking activity, and Amazon evaluates purchasing habits. Each platform uses these behavioral profiles to determine access to services, opportunities, and social connections.
This behavioral scoring extends beyond apps. Credit scores, for instance, affect not only loan eligibility but also housing options, job opportunities, and insurance rates. Lenders are increasingly scanning social media profiles, and payment apps are tracking spending patterns to build risk profiles. Even dating apps use engagement rates to determine visibility.
The Fragmented Nature of Western Social Credit
Currently, these behavioral scoring networks are fragmented and don't directly communicate. An Uber rating doesn't affect mortgage rates, and LinkedIn engagement doesn't impact insurance premiums. However, the infrastructure to connect these systems is being built, potentially leading to more comprehensive social credit systems in the future.
Unlike China's explicit approach, Western systems often hide their decision-making processes. While China offers some visibility into how behavioral data is used, Western algorithms operate as black boxes.
The Illusion of Choice
It's often argued that the difference between corporate tracking and government surveillance lies in choice. Consumers can switch services, while governments have monopoly power. However, switching costs for major platforms can be significant, and corporate social credit systems are increasingly collaborating. Furthermore, Western governments already access corporate data through legal channels.
The Inevitable Spread of Social Credit
Social credit systems are spreading globally because they address coordination problems, reduce fraud, and create behavioral incentives. The question isn't whether Western societies will adopt social credit but whether they will be transparent and accountable about it.
Trends suggest that both China and the West are evolving toward more comprehensive behavioral scoring. European digital identity initiatives are linking multiple service scores, US cities are experimenting with behavioral incentive programs, corporate platforms are sharing reputation data, and financial services are integrating social media analysis into lending decisions.
If both systems evolve toward comprehensive behavioral scoring, which approach better serves individual agency? One that admits it's scoring you, or one that pretends algorithmic recommendations are just helpful suggestions?
When Uber can destroy your transportation access with a hidden algorithm, and when credit scores determine your housing options through opaque calculations, is that really more free than a system where you know at least some of the behaviors that affect your score?
A Future of Transparent Rules?
As China's explicit social credit approach inevitably influences Western platforms, apps may start revealing the behavioral scores they've always calculated. When the rules become visible instead of hidden, it may be time to re-evaluate the game and decide whether to play along. Is this a future to look forward to, or a risk to be mitigated?